8 reasons to film your own press conference (or why YouTube is a free kitten)

July 2, 2009

Henry_Wade_1963_press_conference_NYWTS

Lately I’ve been filming a lot of press conferences for local advocacy groups and a common response I get is “Will anyone really watch this stuff on YouTube?“ They have a point… to a point. But I still think filming press conferences is an important exercise for creating and posting content online. Here are my reasons:

1. YouTube channels are free kittens (or cultivating an audience). Someone once said, open source software is “free as in free kittens.” The same is true of tools like YouTube and other video sites: They might be free but they need care and nurturing to thrive. The public judges your organization based on how active your channel is. If you only have a few videos from your annual dinner, most online audiences will think that you’re not serious about using this technology or, even worse, out of step and behind the times. Keeping your channel active is the means of building and cultivating your audience, especially for when you need them in the future for fundraising or urgent actions. In this case, something is better than nothing.

2. Reviewing your public speaking skills. Everyone is curious about the way they look on camera. Taping the presentations you or staff make gives you the opportunity to review them critically and improve. Did you read too much and not look at the audience? Did you speak too softly or too quickly? Colleagues might be able to tell you these things but why not judge for yourself?

3. Documenting your organization’s work. Nonprofits have always struggled with letting the public know what they’ve been up to with the money they’ve donated. Newsletters and e-mail blasts are two examples of this need. But why not record your organization’s work in action, literally? For now, maybe press conferences are often the best way to do this. Videos give your supporters a taster or sense of the events your events, even if they can’t participate. Staff are summarizing and making compelling cases to a corporate media audience, exactly what you try to capture in words for your newsletters. If you want to, include video links in your e-newsletters to further impress your supporters.

4. Fact checking the media. “Did I really say that?” These days anyone can report the news but questions of accuracy and truthfulness are still of utmost concern. Video helps you fact check what was said at a press conference. It also contextualizes the quotes or sound bites that corporate media gloms onto.

5. Controlling and magnifying your message. Advocacy groups are often frustrated by how corporate or Big Media sometimes doesn’t get the story right or even cover the story at all. By videotaping your press conference, you are able to control what your major points and concerns are without hoping and praying that intermediaries will convey it correctly. If you’re building an audience online, you can communicate directly with the public without relying on a third party that might not get it right… or even show up at the press conference.

6. Practice using technology. In the entire history of human communications technology, internet video is very very new. Just like email, social networking websites and digital photography, we’re all still learning how video works. As Clay Shirky has said, “Tools don’t get socially interesting until they get technologically boring.” If you and your organization get in the habit of shooting, editing, approving and uploading video, it won’t be as big a deal. Your staff will become accustomed to the process and be able to put aside technical concerns in moving a project forward. You can also argue that it will help you save money. If you build your organization’s internal capacity to make video, you’re less reliant on “professionals” for small amateur jobs (As a consultant, should I be writing that?)

7. Creatively thinking about distribution. If you’re creating content, you have to also work to get people to see it. Apparently over 80% of online video’s viewership comes through blog posts. In other words, what bloggers do you know that you can rely on to help with distributing your videos? Have you been participating in online discussions and commenting on posts? Are you an active member on Facebook and Twitter? If you’re done the work in creating “street cred” online, folks will be more willing to share the videos you make. The more often you do this, the better. Bloggers, social network addicts and tweeters are always looking for visual images to link with their stories. If you have cultivated relationships with them and they look to you for primary sources like video, you’ll be able to depend on them when you really need them, like when you make that urgent video you’ve really invested time and energy, that you’re super proud of and need help distributing.

8. Learning what makes good online videos and changing approach. As some of you may have been thinking, are press conferences still really the best way to get out your message? This brings me back to the initial skepticism of posting these types of videos. Addmittedly press conferences don’t make the most compelling video content. Check out any of the videos below and you’ll see that many rank only in the 100-200 views range if that. But, in this case, the final product is not really the point.

Above are seven other reasons that filming even seemingly boring stuff is good for you and your organization. But the biggest reason is that it stretches YOUR thinking about online video. Once the technology of creating and distributing becomes rote and the internal processes of your organization start viewing video like creating simple Word documents, you’ll be able to take a step back and think about strategies for engaging your audience more effectively and spurring them to action. Maybe you won’t do press conferences as much. Maybe they’ll die away completely. If you’ve invested the time in practicing, you’ll be able to create even better content that will be better suited to reach your advocacy goals.

—————————-

Examples of recent press conference events that I’ve filmed (This is partially a ploy to get more viewers):

1. “Slice of life” or summary of an event: Short clips of different aspects of the event but not coverage of every minute.

2. Filming the entire event: Each speaker or event component is uploaded as separate videos and organized as a playlist. Everything is filmed except breaks and transitions between speakers.

3. Do you have other examples of video styles to cover press conferences and other organizational events?


Students rally for DREAM Act across the country

June 26, 2009

I filmed the above footage at the Los Angeles DREAM Graduation event that Dream Team LA held on June 23, 2009 to coincide with the national graduation happening in Washington D.C. on the same day. The graduation featured student testimonials as well as a call to action.

By the way, I filmed it with my new HD Flip Camera. If you go to the video on the YouTube site, try clicking the HD button on the lower right side. The zoom is a little better on this version of the camera. Overall, what do you think of the picture?


Reform Immigration for America campaign launches this week

June 7, 2009

In an impressive multi-state action, the new national campaign “Reform Immigration for America” launched this week. The video above shows highlights from the Los Angeles rally.

More than 800 activists then went to Washington, DC for a summit that featured dozens of impressive speakers. Following up on the 100,000 faxes that the campaign generated from supporters, the advocates visited legislators on Capitol Hill.

Here’s more on the Summit and the overall campaign:

Stay tuned: more debriefings, actions from the campaign, etc.


Congress, can you hear me now?

May 1, 2009

Here’s a video I made for the Center for Community Change and their Mobile Action Network. Obviously we parodied those ubiquitous Verizon commercials. I’m itching to make another one like the new commercial in an ice cream shop.

Here’s the Spanish version:


User-generated Content and the Fear of Losing Control: Lessons from “In the Motherhood”?

April 7, 2009

picture-1User-generated content is a cornerstone of social media. And “UGC” is changing the way we look at media. The very idea of user-generated content often strikes fear into the hearts of many nonprofit advocacy organizations simply because of the supposed loss of control. But it seems that nonprofits are not the only ones with this concern.

Just in case you forgot what TV is, a new show on ABC “In the Motherhood” has shed new light on the tension around user-generated content. It’s also caused some interesting comparisons between between the Web video world and the traditional television industry. Brian Stetler of the New York Times discussed this difference in an interesting article on the series here.

If you haven’t heard of the series, it was originally started as an ad campaign where mothers were invited to send in funny personal stories that could be incorporated into the web series. But when the series moved to ABC Television, it ran afoul of the writers’ union agreements. Turns out that viewers are still invited to send in their stories: there’s just no promise that they’ll be used in any way. But the latest news is that ABC is not ordering any new episodes and may not bode well for the series.

For me, this is an interesting story about New and Old media colliding. In the case of “In the Motherhood”, something about the original conceptpicture-3 made the content interesting and new. But when folks tried to retool it for television and dealt with the realities of producing something in a broadcast medium, something was lost.

For nonprofits, there may be a lesson here. User-generated content is a new and vibrant way to interact with constituents and donors. But it may also change the way you do business… in a good way. After all, aren’t nonprofts accountable to the public, either through their boards or membership? User-generated content should be seen as fostering leadership development; getting members of the public to think through and create something of use to your organization.

Of course, there are still issues about what members of the public possess the technological tools necessary to create user-generated content about the issue you work on (i.e. the “Digital Divide“). This is a real and persistant concern. But if nonprofits could begin small experiments is creating content WITH constituents offline (i.e. video), imagine what this transfusion might mean to our work!

What do you think? Know of any examples where user-generated content augmented (or even compromised) the advocacy of a nonprofit organization?


Whither digital video? Cisco, Flip Cameras and the Future

April 2, 2009

picture-11Where is online video headed in the near future?

I’m not the only one wondering this. There’s lots of speculation about video these days. Skellie over at Skelliewag wrote recently about video being “your chance to be a pioneer” (mainly in videoblogging or “vlogging”). The potential of mobile video is also getting a lot of buzz (i.e. this post on Mashable).

And now, late last month, Cisco Systems announced that they bought Pure Digital, the makers of the Flip Video Camera, for $590 million. Observers marveled that Cisco is dipping it’s toe into the consumer market beyond it’s traditional area of corporate networking and communications systems.

SMC @ Shertaon Universal Hotel. Photo by Marc Salsberry

SMC @ Sheraton Universal Hotel. Photo by Marc Salsberry

Funnily enough, I heard more from another source in the know. I was fortunate enough to attend the Social Media Club gathering about brand building via social media this week where one of the speakers, Anne Plese, was from Cisco. Along with the other excellent panelists Babette Pepaj of Bakespace and Rob Frankel of Frankelbiz, Anne talked about how her company uses social media to listen and interact with the public to build their brand. Plese admitted that Cisco’s interest in the plumbing for information technology meant that they saw the rise in video usage testing the capacity of their pipelines. Of course, I had to ask a question about what this might mean for the future of social media brand-building. Anne said she wasn’t at liberty to discuss picture-2much… on camera, of all things! But she was happy to talk offline (see photo of me waiting).

[Here's the video of the panel from TechZulu.]

As you may know by now, video is compelling to me. It’s mainly because of video’s potential in promoting inter-community communication. Like text-based communication, video is not new but the opportunities to create, collaborate and share are. Unlike text-driven digital tools, however, video requires more conceptualization and pre-planning which provides the opportunity for offline group collaboration. Text-based tools are often anonymous, spur of the moment, potentially contentious and, due to the necessity of literacy in one common language, often exclusionary. Through visual forms of media like video, people speaking different languages can communicate a great deal through physical action and facial expressions (a process which can be augmented by subtitles). Food for thought and I’m curious what y’all think.

Stay tuned on this subject. Much more to come!


Too much information causing brain freeze?

March 24, 2009
Photo from Avelino Maestas' photostream

From Avelino Maestas' Flickr photostream

I don’t know about you but sometimes, with all these new information tools online, my brain sometimes feels overloaded. It’s kind of like when you eat ice cream too fast and it causes “brain freeze“.

I’ve been upping my info intake with Google Reader, the great RSS tool that helps you read multiple blogs each day. When I first set it up, I gasped because it looks like yet another email account I need to monitor. I’m slowly upping my intake of more and more blogs and may soon reach my capacity for taking it all in.

I’ve also been adjusting to Twitter’s real-time microblogging. Now that Facebook’s News Feed has also become “real-time”, I feel like I’m trying to keep up with multiple newstickers in Times Square.

Don’t get me wrong. I love these news tools and the information-sharing they provide. But how do you manage it all and have time to do other things?

I recently met Mark Luckie after his excellent workshop at the New America Media training in Los Angeles (see tags for resources along left hand side of his site 1000 Words). He shared these tools with me:

BTW, it’s interesting that the first three of the tools in this Mashable post no longer seem to exist.

I’m wondering if any of you have experience with any of them and which will work the best. I plan to try them all out but realize that this is only one approach to the information onslaught we all face these days.

More articles/ blog posts on the subject:


Did you miss SXSW Interactive? Check out this excellent workshop from Beth Kanter & friends!

March 18, 2009

picture-8I didn’t get to go to Austin this year for the SXSW interactive conference (I’m going to NTEN instead: the Nonprofit Technology Network conference).

I did however get to remotely participate (via Twitter) in Nonprofit Social Media guru (and my idol) Beth Kanter’s excellent workshop on ROI for Nonprofit Social Media campaigns.

Not only was the presentation formatted as a Poetry Slam (genius!), but it offered excellent perspectives from a number of pioneers in the field of nonprofit tech or social media for social good. We were instructed to follow the hastag #ROI on Twitter for questions and discussion from the session. Due to the lively tweet-fueled discussion, folks who monitor Twitter trends started asking why “ROI” suddenly became the top hashtag for that day.

Read more about reflections about the presentation on Beth Kanter’s blog and here.

So I’m kinda sick about the fact that I missed this monumental event in the history of NonprofitTech presentations. But I hope she does a repeat at NTEN next month!


“Hyper-local” or Local Media for Social Change? Community event March 21

March 15, 2009

I’m helping out with this important local event (i.e. filming and editing the video above). If you’re in the area, be sure to come by and be part of the discussion!

Local Media for Social Change: A Southern California Regional Summit

How happy are you with your local news?  How are the issues you care about being covered? If you are concerned that our democracy and your community are being underserved by the state of today’s media, then you should join us for this informative half-day summit.

Saturday, March 21, 2009; 11:00am to 5:15pm, with reception to follow

Occidental College
(Mosher Auditorium in the Norris Hall of Chemistry)
1600 Campus Rd
Eagle Rock
Los Angeles, CA 90041

Panel Discussion

  • How do local media help or hurt our communities?
  • How can we participate in media to affect local social change?

Panelists

  • Moderated by Tanya Acker, Political Analyst (CNN, MSNBC, FOX)

Sample Breakout Sessions:

  • Citizen journalism/Internet: You Be the News or U B the News
  • Using Social Networking to get your message out
  • Not being heard? Start your own story
  • Breaking the Digital Divide: Internet for Everyone
  • Saving LA Public Access
  • Indigenous Media

Sign up to attend today so that you can:

  • Gain and share knowledge/experience
  • Network with local activists
  • Learn how today’s media environment affects what we know — and what we don’t
  • Get tips on how to make your message heard
  • Find out ways to bring about change.

Tickets are $15 in advance / $20 at the door / $10 for students (with valid ID) and youth (18 and under).  Add $8 if you would like a boxed lunch. Free for Occidental College students, faculty and staff.

Don’t forget to join the event’s Facebook group!


Learning by doing video (i.e. @ Family Unity tour event in L.A.)

March 14, 2009

“Good effort,” is what staff at a nonprofit organization told me when I sent them a recent community-generated video that I helped produce. While I was initially struck by the backhanded nature of the compliment, I’ve been thinking it’s kind of an accurate assessment of making video content.

I’ll admit the above video is no masterpiece of cinematography. That’s not the point. I’m learning about what makes good video content. And it’s a process. When I went to the Family Unity tour event, I hadn’t planned on videotaping anything. I happened to have my Flip camera with me (this is not paid advertising, I swear) and thought I’d capture a sense of the event. The thing I love about the Flip camera is how low-tech and user-friendly it is, both in shooting and editing. Sure, the quality isn’t perfect, especially in zooming. I guess that’s why I like to add the little Flip

NY Times: Michael Moritz, a venture capitalist who was an early investor in Silicon Valley titans like Google and Yahoo, saw the potential in the Flip video camera, developed by Jonathan Kaplan, foreground. http://is.gd/nxim

NY Times: Michael Moritz, a venture capitalist who was an early investor in Silicon Valley titans like Google and Yahoo, saw the potential in the Flip video camera, developed by Jonathan Kaplan, foreground.

animation at the end: it’s kind of an explanation for the quality. But, hey, it’s handy and it works.

I knew I couldn’t get the definitive video footage of every speech and component of the event. I wanted people who didn’t attend to understand a little of what it was like to be there. I’ve been thinking a lot about video and how it’s inherently different than the text-based communication that dominates so much social media online (i.e. blogs, Twitter, social-networking, etc.). Due to language differences between communities, it seems to me that video might be more effective in crossing barriers and promoting understanding. As humans, we communicate a lot without language, such as facial expressions or physical action.

That’s why in the video above, I took a snapshot perspective of the event rather than something that captured whole speeches. I wanted to capture the little human scenes you’d see if you came. I particularly like the shot of the mother and son from behind. Even though we can’t see their faces, we can still sense a scene we’re very familiar with: being close to a parent and how that feels. That’s exactly what the Family Unity tour is getting at: if immigration law separates families, parents won’t be able to comfort their children like this.

So my question to you: do you think this works on some level? What suggestions do you have for improving the next one?